I refer to your recent communication copied to me and would respond as follows:-
From your communication I note that you refer to advice supplied by the Chief Executive which I would have thought sufficiently clarifies matters for you. If however you are not content with this advice or have further issues with it then I would suggest that you take the matter up again with him. You will also be aware I am sure of the process of investigation, timing and confidentiality when complaints are lodged with the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life. Any further factual information that you require with regard to the dealing with the complaints against you I would suggest that you obtain direct from those sources. This also applies to the complaint that you refer to at point 11 in your communication.
Following the experiences of many who have communicated with you in recent times I can see no useful or worthwhile purpose in giving my thoughts/views on the recent Hearing, the Judgement, or with its outcome.
I reject completely the position promulgated by you that I have since before 2012 made you the subject of a vendetta. This embellishment , though, I accept useful to you, when viewing all of the facts, is contrary to what, in reality, has progressed in practice.
Being frank with you then I would suggest that you review all our communications. I respond to you, or not given the circumstances and tone of the communications, and as I see fit. This is my right and no amount of intended bullying or harassment from you will alter this.
So, the poor wee soul thinks that me asking questions of him is bullying or harassment. Shame on me. However, this kind of nonsense cannot be ignored so I replied saying:
You well know there is no bullying or harassment but what there is is now a refusal to answer reasonable questions. Will you therefore agree that an enquiry into this matter is now essential if matters are to be clarified?
I copied everyone back in and, as of today, he hasn’t replied to this additional question. As I said to all those copied in, you can come to your own conclusions. He won’t now reply to the list of legitimate questions so it is now even more urgent that people sign the petition to ask the Scottish Government to instigate an enquiry, link below.
As I think I said in a previous post, I submitted a subject access request to find out when the complaint against me was discussed, who was present, minutes of meetings etc. Today they said they would process my request but I had to pay them a £10 fee to find out what they were saying about me. The irony. The fee will be paid though but will it reveal anything of the inner workings against me? Who knows.